Entrepreneurs often get the advice from their lawyers and friends to always get a Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDA or CDA) signed before disclosing anything about their new venture. Most investors and startup advisors I know hate them, and refuse to sign them. Who is right?
Let me try to put this question in perspective. If you are totally risk-averse, then push to always get signed NDAs. You won’t last long as an entrepreneur in this category, since a startup is all about taking risks. On the other hand, if you intend to patent an idea, you need a signed confidentiality agreement from everyone knowing details, or you will legally lose patent rights.
The format of an NDA is simple, and you can download a sample from my website. Here are some rule-of-thumb considerations that should help you decide when an NDA is really required, or actually has negative value:
- Trusted professional. If you want advice or funding, and the person you are about to pitch to is a certified investor, or a senior business advisor, skip the NDA. These people value their professional integrity, like your doctor or lawyer, and they are not competitors. Asking for an NDA is an insult and will jeopardize your case before you start.
- Unknown interested party. If you meet someone through Internet networking, or if someone with no visible professional standing contacts you with interest in your plan, an NDA is the least you should do protect yourself. Verifying credentials through multiple sources is even better.
- Strategic partner. The line between competitor and partner is a fine one these days. An NDA is highly recommended before you talk to a similar company about a joint venture, white labeling, or any investment options. I recommend a mutual non-disclosure, with a non-compete clause, for protection in both directions.
- Prior to patent application. As I mentioned earlier, you should never disclose details of a potential patent to anyone without getting a signed and dated NDA. That doesn’t mean you can’t talk in general terms about your idea, and even pitch to investors. Investors don’t need to hear the details anyway, until the due diligence phase.
- Trade secrets. A trade secret is a formula, practice, process, design, instrument, pattern, or compilation of information which is not patentable, but gives you an economic advantage over competitors or customers. When someone needs to know the details, get an NDA, even with your own employees.
- Period covered. Typically NDAs have terms of two to five years. In today’s fast moving world, a longer term makes no sense, and is viewed by the signor as an unreasonable restriction on future activities. You can always renew the NDA before it expires, if it is still relevant.
Venture capitalists and angel investors won’t sign NDAs for two reasons: 1) they don’t want the constraints or litigation a few have faced from rogue entrepreneurs, and 2) they feel that if by simply describing the problem you solve, you give away your business, there is almost no chance you will be able to create a defensible position in the market.
There will be some companies who, for perfectly valid business reasons, do not wish to sign an NDA. This doesn’t mean that they are dishonest, but simply that they may not wish to manage the risks involved. As an example, they want to avoid any future conflict with products they may already be working on.
Sharing original work which you intend to commercialize with a startup requires a high degree of mutual trust. Remember that without an NDA, you can still explain what your idea does, but not how it functions or how it’s made. That should be enough to excite interest at a first meeting, and the feedback is worth more than the risk.
Marty Zwilling




Thanks for the great article - I never thought about the stigma to NDA before.
ReplyDeleteJust posted something similar - would love to hear your thoughts! If you ever want to link up sometime over GoToMeeting to talk about a possible collaborative article, let me know!
http://takecareof.biz
Thanks Marty. This is an all too common scenario.
ReplyDeleteOne subtle variant is the use of one-way NDAs and other agreements. A two-way agreement is what you want, not a one-way.
If you don't think the other party has anything of value to disclose to you, then why disclose what you think is of value to them?
A classic clause is:
"Without limiting the foregoing restriction, the hereby grants to the Corporation a world-wide... license to ... any pre-existing intellectual property of the ."
If you paid your lawyers for this boilerplate, they should amend it without charge.
By definition, an entrepreneur is going to need help and information from others. Putting an agreement in front of an advisor that more or less states, "everything that is yours is mine" is more foolish than insulting.
Regards, David (http://d-bits.com)
I loved what youve done here. The design is elegant, your stuff classy. Yet, youve got an edginess to what youre offering here. Ill definitely come back for more if you keep this up. Dont lose hope if not too many people see your vision, know youve got a fan right here who values what youve got to say and the way youve presented yourself. good on you!
ReplyDeleteBusiness Loans
Incredibly beneficial article. I’ve discovered your web site by Google and I am genuinely happy about the information you present with your posts. Anyway keep in the great hard work!
ReplyDeleteBusiness Loans
Good advice, Marty. A couple of follow-on comments (not legal advice...go talk to an attorney:). I think you lose international filing rights if you disclose an invention in public, but the US allows for a one-year grace period. If you are only pursuing US rights, sing about your idea to any passerby who might care (and 99% of them won't!). If you are interested in preserving rights, you need to start your conversation with something like "I am telling you this in confidence" - this may be implied for certain professionals (like attorneys), but it is easy enough to say so be explicit.
ReplyDeleteThe number one thing that kills startups: not enough early feedback on their idea.
Matt
http://leanfounder.com
Thanks for this wonderful article and thanks again for sharing the info with us. Never knew about getting NDA before giving our business secrets.
ReplyDeleteAlthough some are starting to view trade secret protection as a viable alternative to patent protection, trade secrets are much more vulnerable -- and, once the cat is out of the bag, there is often little recourse for redressing that loss of secrecy. The recent, purported disclosure of the Coca-Cola recipe is just one story illustrating the tenuousness of trade secret IP rights. On the other hand, some may say that almost 140 years of trade secret protection (in Coke's example) is a pretty good run.
ReplyDeleteThank you for useful info. It was simple to read, but I'd like to add that if your company needs to be updated try mobile software development.
ReplyDelete